Tuesday, 3 November 2026 Updated 1 hour ago
The News Engine
Latest
Technology United Kingdom

Senior CPS prosecutor cites nonexistent case in high court, raising AI concerns

The Guardian reported that a senior Crown prosecutor cited a legal precedent that does not exist in a high‑court hearing.

Image accompanying the story: Senior CPS prosecutor cites nonexistent case in high court, raising AI concerns
Image: Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA · via The Guardian

The Guardian reported that a senior Crown prosecutor cited a legal precedent that does not exist in a high‑court hearing. Ravinder Dhillon, representing the Crown Prosecution Service, referred to an entirely made‑up case while arguing over whether a child should be prosecuted for raping his younger sister, court documents show. The error, described by the newspaper as “A serious failure”, has added to a growing list of AI‑related mistakes that have appeared in court proceedings. Legal analysts say the incident highlights the risk that artificial‑intelligence tools can generate hallucinated information that is then taken as authoritative. The Guardian noted that the mistaken citation was discovered in the written submissions, prompting renewed scrutiny of how AI‑generated research is used by prosecutors. The episode joins dozens of similar AI errors reported in recent months, prompting calls for tighter safeguards in the justice system.

Why it matters

The incident shows how AI‑generated misinformation can affect legal decisions, potentially undermining the fairness of court proceedings.

Key details

Location
United Kingdom · Europe
Reported by
The Guardian
First reported
Key names
CPS, AI, AI-related, Ravinder Dhillon
Section
Technology

Sources

This is an independent summary. Read the full, original reporting from the publisher:

Read the full story at The Guardian

Spotted an error? Request a correction · How this summary was produced

Related Stories